Accuracy Report

Latest report: 19 September 2025

Methodology

The accuracy report was made by manually reviewing the accuracy of 25 randomly selected article analyses from the last 7 days.

Each analysis was scored using the following:

  • Correct title: 1p
  • Correct publishing date: 0.5p
  • Correct publishing time: 0.5p
  • Correct authors: 1p
  • Appropriate article type: 1p
  • Appropriate tickers: 1p
  • Appropriate sectors: 1p
  • Appropriate people: 1p
  • Appropriate organizations: 1p
  • Appropriate regions: 1p
  • Appropriate significance score: 1p
  • Appropriate sentiments: 1p

In total, an analysis can get 11 points. So for all 25 analyses to be 100% correct they need a combined score of 275 points.

Notes

  • The reviews were done by a human without the use of AI.
  • It's not always obvious whether an analysis is correct, e.g. if a ticker should be included or not. For these cases, a note was added to the review.
  • No analyses were changed after the review.

Results

#
Article
Title
Publishing Date
Publishing Time
Authors
Article Type
Tickers
Sectors
People
Organizations
Regions
Significance
Sentiments
1Link
2Link
3Link
4Link
5Link
6Link
7Link
8Link
9Link
10Link
11Link
12Link
13Link
14Link
15Link
16Link
17Link
18Link
19Link
20Link
21Link
22Link
23Link
24Link
25Link

Summary

Out of 25 articles reviewed, the analyses achieved the following accuracy scores:

  • Perfect scores (11/11 points): 21 articles
  • Good scores (10/11 points): 4 articles

Overall Accuracy: 98.5% (271 out of 275 possible points)

The analyses show excellent performance across all categories, with only minor issues in secondary sector and organization assignments in a few articles.